CTEM is your program. Unizo is the layer underneath it.
Also yours executive sponsor · remediation SLAs · exception and acceptance policy
Unizo takes the assembly work. The decisions stay with your team.
The cost of a cycle is how many times it rebuilds the same picture.
Every tool hands us a different list.
- edge-proxy-03
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-dbcrown jewel
- edge-proxy-03CVE-2026-2213 9.1
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-db
- edge-proxy-03score
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-db
- edge-proxy-03
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-db
- edge-proxy-03JIRA-4471
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-db
- edge-proxy-03
- svc-acct
- role/prod-admin
- customer-db
Every stage starts from one current model of assets, identities, access, ownership and change. That model is Live Security Context. How it stays current.
The ticket arrives owned, decided and explained.
Every team says the asset is not theirs.
- Owner
- Platform Securityresolved via HRIS and IdP
- Which fix
- Patch to 2.4.11chosen from 2 Plan options · approved by security
- What evidence
- 4 connected signalspath attached
- What it touches
- payments-api · nightly-export · svc-acct
routed JIRA-4471 · commitment tracked
Your team approves the Plan. The owner receives one action with its reasoning, in the ITSM you already run.
Scope to proof, every cycle. That is CTEM, operationalized.
The ticket reports done. The environment decides it.
We closed the ticket. Nobody checked the path.
What the environment saysEvery completed ticket triggers a re-check. Every exposure, not the few someone remembers.
A control that breaks the path reports Mitigated. Only a root found not present reports Closed.
How closure is verifiedWhen someone asks what changed, the answer is an artifact.
The board asks what changed. We show a ticket count.
tickets closed · findings by severity · SLA attainment · scan coverage
- The path that existed
- edge-proxy-03 → svc-acct → role/prod-admin → customer-db
- What was decided, and by whom
- Patch to 2.4.11approved by security · owner Platform Security
- What changed in the environment
- CVE-2026-2213 · not presentchecked-as-of 16 Sep 2026 14:02 UTC
- What is retained
- kept after JIRA-4471 closed
Reduced risk is the value. The Report is proof, not the product.
Common questions
Do we need to replace our exposure management or scanning tools?
No. Unizo reads findings from the scanners, cloud, identity and ITSM tools you already run, and works above them. Your program keeps its tools and its framework.
We already run the five stages. Where does Unizo fit?
Underneath them. Your team keeps scope, risk appetite, crown jewels and Plan approval. Unizo maintains the model each stage works from, carries an exposure from validation to an accountable owner, and runs the re-check after the ticket closes.
Do we have to scope the whole estate first?
No. Start with the crown jewels you already know and one exposure path. Scope grows as the program does.
Does Unizo change production?
No. Your team approves the Plan and the accountable owner applies the change. Unizo drafts, routes and tracks the work within the gates you set.
Our CMDB is incomplete. Does ownership still work?
Owners are resolved from your HR system and identity provider, not the CMDB alone.
Bring us one exposure your program already closed.
We will trace the evidence, re-check it against your environment, and show you whether the path is actually gone.