Live Security Context™

Your environment, resolved.

Every tool holds a fragment. Live Security Context continuously resolves them into one current understanding of your assets, identities, access, ownership, and change.

The blind spot

Every tool can be right. The picture can still be wrong.

Each tool accurately reports its own domain. None can see whether those facts combine into a route to something that matters.

Five accurate findings. No shared understanding.

The core idea

The answer isn't in any one finding.
It's in the path between them.

Live Security Context resolves evidence into shared entities, relationships, ownership, and current state, revealing what the findings mean together.

One meaningful exposure path. Not five disconnected findings.

Scored by what matters here

Same CVE. Different environment. Different decision.

A global score is the same everywhere, which makes it useless exactly where you need it. Only your environment knows which exposures reach something worth reaching.

Host A · same CVE
CVE-2026-xxxx · critical
internal-only workload
no privileged identity
no route to critical systems
Limited environmental reach
Severity is identical.
Exposure is not.
Host B · same CVE
CVE-2026-xxxx · critical
internet-facing
service identity, privileged role
route to a critical system
Meaningful exposure path
Isolated findingInternal-only, no privileged route, no critical destination.
Connected exposureInternet-reachable, linked to privileged access and a critical destination.
Context before reasoning

Live Security Context exists before the question.

An agent shouldn't be discovering your environment while it's deciding what to do.

Prompt-time retrieval can gather facts. It cannot recover relationships that were never modeled, state that was never preserved, or context that was never connected. Live Security Context is already built, current, and carrying its evidence before the decision starts.

Assemble context while deciding
Which exposure matters most?
→ query scannerwaiting
→ query identitystale
→ query cloudok
→ locate ownerunavailable
infer relationships…
Uncertain. Reasoning limited to what the APIs returned in that moment.
Reason from maintained context
Which exposure matters most?
Owner: Platform Security Current state · reconciled 2m ago
Reachable path to privileged access. Current state confirmed from the maintained model.

The attacker did their homework in advance. So did you.

Context before reasoning Evidence behind conclusions State before and after
Kept live, tracked over time

Risk changes when the environment changes.

A closed path quietly reopens after a redeploy or a permission change. Live Security Context updates continuously and keeps the history, so you can see whether the path still exists at every point in time.

The model doesn't just remember the finding. It remembers whether the path still exists.

Why this matters

One live model grounds every security decision.

Every step reasons over this one model, which is why every conclusion traces back to your environment instead of a generic score.

See Live Security Context in action.